ReviewCancers2025
Bacterial-Mediated In Situ Engineering of Tumour-Associated Macrophages for Cancer Immunotherapy.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Cancer Neuro-Immunity.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- Microbial allies in skin trauma recovery: from immune modulation to engineered probiotic therapeutics.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Bacteria and Carcinogenesis and the Management of Cancer: A Narrative Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesTumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) are critical components of the tumour microenvironment (TME), significantly influencing cancer progression and treatment resistance. This review aims to explore the innovative use of engineered bacteria to reprogram TAMs, enhancing their anti-tumour functions and improving therapeutic outcomes.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review following a predefined protocol. Multiple databases were searched to identify relevant studies on TAMs, their phenotypic plasticity, and the use of engineered bacteria for reprogramming. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select studies, and data were extracted using standardised forms. Data synthesis was performed to summarise the findings, focusing on the mechanisms and therapeutic benefits of using non-pathogenic bacteria to modify TAMs.
resultsThe review summarises the findings that engineered bacteria can selectively target TAMs, promoting a shift from the tumour-promoting M2 phenotype to the tumour-fighting M1 phenotype. This reprogramming enhances pro-inflammatory responses and anti-tumour activity within the TME. Evidence from various studies indicates significant tumour regression and improved immune responses following bacterial therapy.
conclusionsReprogramming TAMs using engineered bacteria presents a promising strategy for cancer therapy. This approach leverages the natural targeting abilities of bacteria to modify TAMs directly within the tumour, potentially improving patient outcomes and offering new insights into immune-based cancer treatments. Further research is needed to optimise these methods and assess their clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.