Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075599›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Quality of Life After Locoregional Treatment in Women with De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Camille Weiss, Philippe Trensz, Martin Schmitt, Massimo Lodi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camille WeissObstetrics and Gynecology Department, Strasbourg University Hospitals, 67200 Strasbourg, France.
Philippe TrenszSOL Strasbourg Oncologie Liberale, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Martin SchmittRadiation Therapy Department, Metz-Thionville Regional Hospital, 57530 Ars Laquenexy, France.
Massimo LodiBreast, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Louis Pasteur Hospital, 68024 Colmar, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7593-6378

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrimary site locoregional treatment (LRT) of metastatic breast cancer has been performed and evaluated with the aim to improve survival, prevent complications, and alleviate local symptoms. As some studies fail to show a survival benefit, the quality of life is important to consider when deciding on LRT. The aim of this study was to evaluate and quantify the impact of LRT on the quality of life of patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC) through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis.

methodsMultiple databases were searched on May 2024 with the following keywords: (i) dnMBC; (ii) LRT, including surgery +/- radiotherapy; and (iii) QOL.

resultsSix studies were included in the qualitative synthesis and four in meta-analysis (481 women,

conclusionsThis study shows that there is lacking evidence regarding the QOL benefits after LRT in this population, and even a numerical deterioration in global QOL several months after the treatment. Future and ongoing research may provide additional insights into this question on dnMBC and specifics subgroups.

Indexed as

meta-analysismetastatic breast cancerprimary tumorquality of lifesurgery

Identifiers

PMID40075599
PMCPMC11899095

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.