Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40075910›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Sheep Common Peroneal Nerve After Crush Injury.

Rui Alvites, Bruna Lopes, Ana Catarina Sousa, Fábio Pinheiro, Elisabete Silva, Justina Prada, Artur Varejão, Ana Colette Maurício

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rui AlvitesCentro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto (ICETA), Rua D. Manuel II, Apartado 55142, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1945-6377
Bruna LopesCentro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto (ICETA), Rua D. Manuel II, Apartado 55142, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal.
Ana Catarina SousaCentro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto (ICETA), Rua D. Manuel II, Apartado 55142, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8800-2195
Fábio PinheiroDepartamento de Clínicas Veterinárias, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n° 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Elisabete SilvaAssociated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aerospace (LAETA), Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (INEGI), 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2889-4969
Justina PradaAssociate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3902-5374
Artur VarejãoAssociate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0736-3635
Ana Colette MaurícioCentro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente da Universidade do Porto (ICETA), Rua D. Manuel II, Apartado 55142, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-9363

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axonotmesis, a common peripheral nerve injury in humans and animals, leads to significant biomechanical and physiological consequences. The lack of a standardized crushing protocol for complex animal models limits research and therapeutic translations for humans and clinically relevant animal species. This study aimed to assess the impact of different crushing forces on the biomechanical behavior of the sheep common peroneal nerve and to establish a force for standardized in vivo protocols. Fourteen nerves of equal length were harvested and preserved and their initial diameter measured. They were subjected to crushing forces of 0 N, 80 N, and 180 N for one minute. Post crushing, the diameter, ultimate tensile strength, displacement at rupture, stress, strain, and stiffness were evaluated. Results showed that increasing crushing forces significantly affected nerve biomechanical parameters. Nerves crushed with 180N displayed lower tensile strength, displacement, and stiffness but higher stress and strain, indicating greater physical damage and structural degradation. These findings suggest that 180N induces substantial nerve fiber rupture and disruption of nerve trunk support elements, making it a candidate force for an axonotmesis protocol in the ovine model. Future in vivo studies should validate its effectiveness in creating complete crush injuries with functional and histological consequences, facilitating protocol standardization and translational research.

Indexed as

axonotmesisbiomechanical behaviorcommon peroneal nerveperipheral nerveregenerative medicinesheep

Identifiers

PMID40075910
PMCPMC11898189

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.