Evidence mapPaperPMID 40076585Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Trends in Precision Medicine and Pharmacogenetics as an Adjuvant in Establishing a Correct Immunosuppressive Therapy for Kidney Transplant: An Up-to-Date Historical Overview.

Riccardo Belardi, Francesca Pacifici, Matteo Baldetti, Silvia Velocci, Marilena Minieri, Massimo Pieri, Elena Campione, David Della-Morte, Giuseppe Tisone, Alessandro Anselmo and 3 more

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The obese transplant organ recipient: experimental and clinical evidence for tailored immunosuppression.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Riccardo BelardiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-2465-9235
Francesca PacificiDepartment of Human Sciences and Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele University, 00166 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9014-7492
Matteo BaldettiDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Silvia VelocciDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Marilena MinieriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-4793
Massimo PieriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3463-0268
Elena CampioneDermatology Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata, System Medicine Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-6798
David Della-MorteDepartment of Human Sciences and Quality of Life Promotion, San Raffaele University, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe TisoneDepartment of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro AnselmoDepartment of Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-8120
Giuseppe NovelliDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Sergio BernardiniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro TerrinoniDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7442-2252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney transplantation is currently the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage kidney diseases. Although significant advancements in kidney transplantation have been achieved over the past decades, the host's immune response remains the primary challenge, often leading to potential graft rejection. Effective management of the immune response is essential to ensure the long-term success of kidney transplantation. To address this issue, immunosuppressives have been developed and are now fully integrated into the clinical management of transplant recipients. However, the considerable inter- and intra-patient variability in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of these drugs represents the primary cause of graft rejection. This variability is primarily attributed to the polymorphic nature (genetic heterogeneity) of genes encoding xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, transport proteins, and, in some cases, drug targets. These genetic differences can influence drug metabolism and distribution, leading to either toxicity or reduced efficacy. The main objective of the present review is to report an historical overview of the pharmacogenetics of immunosuppressants, shedding light on the most recent findings and also suggesting how relevant is the research and investment in developing validated NGS-based commercial panels for pharmacogenetic profiling in kidney transplant recipients. These advancements will enable the implementation of precision medicine, optimizing immunosuppressive therapies to improve graft survival and kidney transplanted patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Graft RejectionImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineHumansImmunosuppressive Agentsimmunosuppressive therapykidney transplantpharmacogenetic

Identifiers

PMID40076585
PMCPMC11900248

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.