ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Investigation of the Bystander Effect on Cell Viability After Application of Combined Electroporation-Based Methods.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrochemotherapy (ECT) uses electroporation to enhance drug delivery into tumor cells, triggering bystander effects like immunogenicity and cell death. This study investigated bystander effects in vitro in 4T1 breast cancer cells following various electroporation treatments: reversible (1400 V/cm, 100 µs) bleomycin electrotransfer, irreversible (2800 V/cm, 100 µs) bleomycin electrotransfer, and calcium electroporation, including combinations. Conditioned media from treated cells (12-72 h incubation) were transferred to untreated cells, and viability was assessed via metabolic activity, cell count, and colony formation. A scratch assay evaluated wound healing. The bystander effect dramatically reduced colony formation, reaching 0% after bleomycin and calcium electrotransfer, and 2.37 ± 0.74% after irreversible electroporation (IRE). Metabolic activity decreased to 18.05 ± 6.77% and 11.62 ± 3.57% after bleomycin and calcium electrotransfer, respectively, and 56.21 ± 0.74% after IRE. Similarly, cell viability measured by flow cytometry was 10.00 ± 1.44%, 3.67 ± 0.32%, and 24.96 ± 1.37% after bleomycin electrotransfer, calcium electrotransfer, and IRE, respectively. Combined analysis of these effects yielded comparable results. Conditioned media, particularly from bleomycin electrotransfer and calcium electroporation, significantly reduced cell number, metabolic activity, and colony formation, demonstrating a strong bystander effect. Wound healing was also significantly delayed in groups exposed to conditioned media.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.