ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring the Role of Voice Assistants in Managing Noncommunicable Diseases: A Systematic Review on Clinical, Behavioral Outcomes, Quality of Life, and User Experiences.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Your Digital Doctor Will Now See You": A Narrative Review of VR and AI Technology in Chronic Illness Management.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Conversational agents for pharmaceutical use: insights from the eCCo database.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2025Review
- The Future of Healthcare Is Digital: Unlocking the Potential of Mobile Health and E-Health Solutions.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNon-communicable diseases (NCDs) represent a leading cause of global mortality, demanding innovative approaches to management. Voice assistants (VAs) have emerged as promising tools in healthcare, offering support for self-management, behavioral engagement, and patient care. This systematic review evaluates the role of VAs in NCD management, analyzing their impact on clinical and behavioral outcomes, quality of life, usability, and user experiences while identifying barriers to their adoption.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 2014 to October 2024. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria using the PRISMA guidelines. Data extraction focused on outcomes such as usability, acceptability, adherence, clinical metrics, and quality of life. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 and ROBINS-I tools.
resultsEight studies involving 541 participants were included, examining VAs across various NCD contexts such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and mental health. While VAs demonstrated good usability and moderate adherence, their clinical and quality-of-life outcomes were modest. Behavioral improvements, such as increased physical activity and problem-solving skills, were noted in some interventions. Key challenges included privacy concerns, speech recognition errors, and accessibility issues.
conclusionsVAs show potential as supportive tools in NCD management, especially for enhancing patient engagement and self-management, and their impact on clinical outcomes and long-term usability requires further investigation. Future research should focus on diverse populations, standardized metrics, and comparative studies with alternative technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.