ReviewNutrients2025
Vitamin D Supplementation: Practical Advice in Different Clinical Settings.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The 2024 Endocrine Society Guideline on Vitamin D: Comprehensive Summary and Critical Appraisal.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- The Role of Vitamin D Supplementation in Enhancing Muscle Strength Post-Surgery: A Systemic Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- The role of nutrition on thyroid health and disease: myths and facts.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Review
- Review
- The Role of Vitamins and Micronutrients in the Prevention of Melanoma: A Review of Current Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Role of Vitamin D in Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases: From Immunomodulation to Clinical Implications.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Intersections of vitamin D deficiency, HIV and chronic liver diseases.HIV medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Bone Health in Metabolic Syndrome-Is It a Neglected Aspect of Dysmetabolic-Related Diseases?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cholecalciferol vs. calcifediol supplementation on visceral adiposity in people with obesity: a real-world retrospective study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A global deficiency in vitamin D is now widely prevalent. Extensive scientific research has provided compelling evidence of the detrimental effects of vitamin D deficiency on the skeletal system. Furthermore, vitamin D supplementation not only helps prevent bone fractures but may also slow the progression of various conditions, such as diabetes, autoimmune disorders, and cardiovascular disease. Achieving optimal circulating vitamin D levels can be challenging, particularly in certain clinical scenarios. Moreover, the effect of vitamin D supplementation varies depending on factors such as body weight, pregnancy status, absorption capacity, metabolic rate, and renal function. This review aims to explore which vitamin D formulations are most effective in specific clinical contexts where reaching adequate vitamin D levels may not be straightforward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.