Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40077740›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2025

Prevalence and Risk of Sarcopenia in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Alsu R Khurmatullina, Dmitrii N Andreev, Igor V Maev, Yury A Kucheryavyy, Petr A Beliy, Aida R Dzhafarova, Valeriya V Cherenkova, Filipp S Sokolov

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Clinical Practice Update on the Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Management of Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency: Expert Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Malnutrition and sarcopenia are associated with poor quality of life in Indian patients with chronic pancreatitis.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alsu R KhurmatullinaDepartment of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 19435 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0000-4358-7823
Dmitrii N AndreevDepartment of Internal Disease Propaedeutics and Gastroenterology, Russian University of Medicine, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4007-7112
Igor V MaevDepartment of Internal Disease Propaedeutics and Gastroenterology, Russian University of Medicine, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6776-2331
Yury A KucheryavyyIlyinskaya Hospital, 143421 Krasnogorsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7760-2091
Petr A BeliyDepartment of Internal Disease Propaedeutics and Gastroenterology, Russian University of Medicine, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5998-4874
Aida R DzhafarovaDepartment of Internal Disease Propaedeutics and Gastroenterology, Russian University of Medicine, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0001-2963-4205
Valeriya V CherenkovaA.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Centre, 111123 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4361-3216
Filipp S SokolovDepartment of Internal Disease Propaedeutics and Gastroenterology, Russian University of Medicine, 127473 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2813-6498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesSarcopenia is a condition marked by a continuous decline in skeletal muscle strength and volume, often leading to significant health complications. According to several articles, sarcopenia is highly prevalent in chronic pancreatitis (CP) due to exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the pooled prevalence and risk of sarcopenia among CP patients.

methodsThe search process adhered to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO under the identification number CRD42025637059. The search was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and the Russian Science Citation Index (RSCI). It covered studies published between 1 January 1985 and 20 December 2024. Only studies published in English or Russian with detailed comprehensive statistics and adult CP were included. Studies with specific patient populations affecting data objectivity were excluded. Sensitivity analyses were conducted (first, only studies with more than 50 CP patients were considered. Second, the analysis was restricted to full articles, excluding abstracts from conferences).

resultsIn total, 16 studies with 1556 participants (1398 CP patients and 158 controls) met the criteria. The pooled prevalence of sarcopenia was 39.117% (95% CI: 28.891-49.852) in CP patients and 7.745% (95% CI: 2.154-42.622) in the control group. An association was found between sarcopenia and CP using the fixed-effects model when compared to the control group (RR = 2.194, 95% CI: 1.502-3.203).

conclusionsSarcopenia is underdiagnosed in CP patients despite its significant clinical impact. Management strategies, including pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy, nutritional support, and resistance training show potential in the treatment of this state. Further research is needed to establish standardized diagnostic criteria and unified treatment approaches. Early detection and comprehensive care are essential to improving outcomes in CP patients with sarcopenia.

Indexed as

Pancreatitis, ChronicSarcopeniaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk Factorschronic pancreatitismeta-analysissarcopeniasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40077740
PMCPMC11902046

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.