ArticleJournal of diabetes investigation2025
Characterization of treatment intensified (add-on to metformin) adults with type 2 diabetes in Thailand: A cross-sectional real-world study (CONVERGE).
Article in Journal of diabetes investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe CONVERGE (Cardiovascular Outcomes and Value in the Real-World with GLP-1RAs) study characterized demographics, clinical characteristics, and medication use in treatment-intensified (add-on to metformin) adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Thailand.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional study of data from medical records (Jul 26, 2013, to Dec 31, 2017) was descriptively summarized for overall population and subgroups defined by glucose-lowering agent (GLA) classes.
resultsData from 1,000 adults were collected in reverse chronological order. At baseline, the mean (SD) age was 60 (12) years, HbA
conclusionsThese results indicate low utilization of GLAs with CV benefits, attributed to a lack of CV benefit data during the study period and partial reimbursement implementation. Future studies must identify barriers to adoption and estimate the usage of these GLAs with CV benefits as more evidence becomes available on positive CV outcomes to improve patient care in Thailand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.