ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025
Control of medical digital twins with artificial neural networks.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning dynamical systems with biochemically informed neural ordinary differential equations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Digital health technologies in medicine: evidence, artificial intelligence integration, and ethical challenges.Infectious agents and cancer · 2026Review
- Toward Artificial Intelligence in Oncology and Cardiology: A Narrative Review of Systems, Challenges, and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Reconstructing noisy gene regulation dynamics using extrinsic-noise-driven neural stochastic differential equations.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Review
- Control of medical digital twins with artificial neural networks.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025Article
- Digital twins in healthcare: a comprehensive review and future directions.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Optimal control of agent-based models via surrogate modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of precision medicine is to tailor interventions to an individual patient's unique characteristics. A key technology for this purpose involves medical digital twins, computational models of human biology that can be personalized and dynamically updated to incorporate patient-specific data. Certain aspects of human biology, such as the immune system, are not easily captured with physics-based models, such as differential equations. Instead, they are often multi-scale, stochastic and hybrid. This poses a challenge to existing control and optimization approaches that cannot be readily applied to such models. Recent advances in neural-network control methods hold promise in addressing complex control problems. However, the application of these approaches to biomedical systems is still in its early stages. This work employs dynamics-informed neural-network controllers as an alternative approach to control of medical digital twins. As a first use case, we focus on the control of agent-based models (ABMs), a versatile and increasingly common modelling platform in biomedicine. The effectiveness of the proposed neural-network control methods is illustrated and benchmarked against other methods with two widely used ABMs. To account for the inherent stochastic nature of the ABMs we aim to control, we quantify uncertainty in relevant model and control parameters.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 1)'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.