Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078154›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2025

Control of medical digital twins with artificial neural networks.

Lucas Böttcher, Luis L Fonseca, Reinhard C Laubenbacher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  6. Challenges and opportunities in uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Control of medical digital twins with artificial neural networks.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Personalizing computational models to construct medical digital twins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucas Böttcher *Department of Computational Science and Philosophy, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Frankfurt am Main 60322, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1700-1897
Luis L Fonseca *Department of Medicine, Laboratory for Systems Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7902-742X
Reinhard C LaubenbacherDepartment of Medicine, Laboratory for Systems Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9143-9451

Funding

Army Research OfficeDefense Advanced Research Projects Agencyhessian.AINIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of precision medicine is to tailor interventions to an individual patient's unique characteristics. A key technology for this purpose involves medical digital twins, computational models of human biology that can be personalized and dynamically updated to incorporate patient-specific data. Certain aspects of human biology, such as the immune system, are not easily captured with physics-based models, such as differential equations. Instead, they are often multi-scale, stochastic and hybrid. This poses a challenge to existing control and optimization approaches that cannot be readily applied to such models. Recent advances in neural-network control methods hold promise in addressing complex control problems. However, the application of these approaches to biomedical systems is still in its early stages. This work employs dynamics-informed neural-network controllers as an alternative approach to control of medical digital twins. As a first use case, we focus on the control of agent-based models (ABMs), a versatile and increasingly common modelling platform in biomedicine. The effectiveness of the proposed neural-network control methods is illustrated and benchmarked against other methods with two widely used ABMs. To account for the inherent stochastic nature of the ABMs we aim to control, we quantify uncertainty in relevant model and control parameters.This article is part of the theme issue 'Uncertainty quantification for healthcare and biological systems (Part 1)'.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPrecision MedicineComputer SimulationHumansModels, BiologicalStochastic ProcessesUncertaintyartificial neural networkscontrolmedical digital twinssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID40078154
PMCPMC11904622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.