Evidence mapPaperPMID 40078337Full record

ArticleClinical epidemiology2025

Explainable Prediction of Long-Term Glycated Hemoglobin Response Change in Finnish Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Following Drug Initiation Using Evidence-Based Machine Learning Approaches.

Gunjan Chandra, Piia Lavikainen, Pekka Siirtola, Satu Tamminen, Anusha Ihalapathirana, Tiina Laatikainen, Janne Martikainen, Juha Röning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gunjan Chandra *Biomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0051-0268
Piia Lavikainen *School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3560-8860
Pekka SiirtolaBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5995-5421
Satu TamminenBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5215-6889
Anusha IhalapathiranaBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3276-2056
Tiina LaatikainenNorth Karelia Wellbeing Services County (Siun Sote), Joensuu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-4782
Janne MartikainenSchool of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0855-3921
Juha RöningBiomimetics and Intelligent Systems Group, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9993-8602

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study applied machine learning (ML) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to predict changes in HbA1c levels, a critical biomarker for monitoring glycemic control, within 12 months of initiating a new antidiabetic drug in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. It also aimed to identify the predictors associated with these changes. Patients and Methods: Electronic health records (EHR) from 10,139 type 2 diabetes patients in North Karelia, Finland, were used to train models integrating randomized controlled trial (RCT)-derived HbA1c change values as predictors, creating offset models that integrate RCT insights with real-world data. Various ML models-including linear regression (LR), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), ridge regression (RR), random forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB)-were evaluated using Results: Results showed that ML models outperform RCT model, while LR, MLP, and RR models had comparable performance, RF and XGB models exhibited overfitting. The follow-up MLP model outperformed the baseline MLP model, with higher Conclusion: Using EHR and ML models allows for the development of more realistic and individualized predictions of HbA1c changes, accounting for more diverse patient populations and their heterogeneous nature, offering more tailored and effective treatment strategies for managing T2D. The use of XAI provided insights into the influence of specific predictors, enhancing model interpretability and clinical relevance. Future research will explore treatment selection models.

Indexed as

HbA1cmachine learningSHAPtreatment effect estimationtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID40078337
PMCPMC11899941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.