ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Non-linear association of the metabolic score for insulin resistance with obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2015-2018.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The relationship between the Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR), a novel index integrating multiple metabolic parameters, and the risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) remains under explored. Methods: Analyses were conducted on data from 2,348 participants included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2015 to 2018. Logistic regression, stratified analyses, curve-fitting analyses, and threshold effects analyses were employed to evaluate the association between METS-IR and the risk of OSA. Results: Multifactorial logistic regression analyses revealed a significant positive correlation between METS-IR and the risk of OSA [OR: 1.05 (95% CI: 1.04-1.06)]. Stratified analyses showed consistent associations across various subgroups, including sex, race, age, marital status, education level, poverty income ratio, physical activity, alcohol use, smoking status, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. Nonlinear analysis identified an inflection point at METS-IR 46.65. On the left of the inflection point, the risk of OSA increased significantly, with each unit increase in METS-IR associated with a 7% increase in risk [OR: 1.07 (95% CI: 1.05-1.08)]. On the right side of the inflection point, however, the rate of risk increase slowed to 1% [OR: 1.01 (95% CI: 1.00-1.02)]. Conclusion: This investigation reveals a significant and nonlinear relationship between METS-IR and OSA. Further investigation is needed to explore their association more comprehensively and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.