Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078563›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2025

Improving neuroblastoma risk prediction through a polygenic risk score derived from genome-wide association study-identified loci.

Wenli Zhang, Jinhong Zhu, Mengzhen Zhang, Jiaming Chang, Jiabin Liu, Liping Chen, Xinxin Zhang, Haiyan Wu, Chunlei Zhou, Jing He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A comprehensive survey of genetic variants in neuroblastoma.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic variants of mHuman genomics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wenli Zhang *Department of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, China.
Jinhong Zhu *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Biobank, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150040, China.
Mengzhen Zhang *Department of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, China.
Jiaming ChangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, China.
Jiabin LiuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, China.
Liping ChenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, China.
Xinxin ZhangDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, China.
Haiyan WuDepartment of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, China.
Chunlei ZhouDepartment of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, China.
Jing HeDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Guangzhou Institute of Pediatrics, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510623, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children and has complex genetic underpinnings. Previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified many loci associated with neuroblastoma susceptibility; however, their application in risk prediction for Chinese children has not been systematically explored. This study seeks to enhance neuroblastoma risk prediction by validating these loci and evaluating their performance in polygenic risk models. Methods: We validated 35 GWAS-identified neuroblastoma susceptibility loci in a cohort of Chinese children, consisting of 402 neuroblastoma patients and 473 healthy controls. Genotyping these polymorphisms was conducted via the TaqMan method. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed the genetic loci significantly associated with neuroblastoma risk. We constructed polygenic risk models by combining these loci and assessed their predictive performance via area under the curve (AUC) analysis. We also established a polygenic risk scoring (PRS) model for risk prediction by adopting the PLINK method. Results: Fourteen loci, including ten protective polymorphisms from Conclusions: Our findings validate multiple loci as neuroblastoma risk factors in Chinese children and demonstrate the utility of polygenic risk models, particularly the PRS, in improving risk prediction. These results suggest that integrating multiple genetic variants into a PRS can enhance neuroblastoma risk stratification and potentially improve early diagnosis by guiding targeted screening programs for high-risk children.

Indexed as

GWASneuroblastomapolygenic risk scorepolymorphismsusceptibility

Identifiers

PMID40078563
PMCPMC11893341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.