Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40078600›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Early functional proprioceptive stimulation in high spinal cord injury: a pilot study.

Florence Martinache, Anne-Claire de Crouy, Arnaud Boutin, Jacques Duranteau, Bernard Vigué

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05094752 (Assessment of the Effects of Early Proprioceptive Stimulations in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05094752 naunknown statusnot on this map

Assessment of the Effects of Early Proprioceptive Stimulations in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury : a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2021 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuriesArmsProprioceptive stimulations, Sham stimulations
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florence MartinacheCIAMS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Anne-Claire de CrouyDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Service de Rééducation Post-Réanimation (SRPR), Hôpital Universitaire de Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Arnaud BoutinCIAMS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Jacques DuranteauDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Service de Rééducation Post-Réanimation (SRPR), Hôpital Universitaire de Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Bernard ViguéDépartement d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Service de Rééducation Post-Réanimation (SRPR), Hôpital Universitaire de Bicêtre, APHP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The first months following a spinal cord injury (SCI) are crucial for promoting recovery. However, patients with high SCIs often require prolonged stays in intensive care units (ICUs), delaying optimal rehabilitation due to limited resources. This study examined the safety, feasibility, and effects on spasticity and muscle atrophy of an early rehabilitation technique using non-invasive sensory stimulation and called functional proprioceptive stimulation (FPS). Materials and methods: Ten SCI patients were included in this randomized pilot study, with five receiving early FPS and five receiving sham stimulation. Both groups were treated using the Vibramoov, consisting of 12 computer-synchronized vibrators placed on the lower limbs. Treatment sessions lasted 30 min, four times a week, for up to 8 weeks. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale, Tardieu Scale, Spinal Cord Assessment Tool for Spastic Reflexes, and a patient self-evaluation with a visual analog scale. Muscle atrophy was evaluated through ultrasonography of rectus femoris thickness and cross-sectional area. The duration of the follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 1 year. Results: Treatment began early, with a median of 4 days post-injury for both groups. The number of adverse events was similar between groups, with none linked to the intervention. No medium-term effects on spasticity or muscle atrophy could be identified. However, our results show a tendency toward a beneficial short-term effect of FPS on spasticity, observed for all spasticity measurements. Discussion: This pilot study shows that early FPS is feasible and safe for SCI as early as the intensive care unit stage. We demonstrated that FPS induced a transient relaxation and spasticity reduction that could potentially enhance a rehabilitation session administered shortly after it, but larger studies are needed to determine the medium and long-term effects. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT05094752).

Indexed as

early rehabilitationintensive caremuscle atrophyproprioceptive stimulationspasticityspinal cord injurytendon vibration

Identifiers

PMID40078600
PMCPMC11897281

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.