ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Scaling up drug combination surface prediction.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Computational approaches for drug-drug interaction prediction: a systematic review of data sources, modeling strategies, and evaluation frameworks.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- DeepSynBa: actionable drug combination prediction with complete dose-response profiles.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- CDCR-Rank: a computational model for predicting drug combination dose response using ranking-based optimization.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug combinations are required to treat advanced cancers and other complex diseases. Compared with monotherapy, combination treatments can enhance efficacy and reduce toxicity by lowering the doses of single drugs-and there especially synergistic combinations are of interest. Since drug combination screening experiments are costly and time-consuming, reliable machine learning models are needed for prioritizing potential combinations for further studies. Most of the current machine learning models are based on scalar-valued approaches, which predict individual response values or synergy scores for drug combinations. We take a functional output prediction approach, in which full, continuous dose-response combination surfaces are predicted for each drug combination on the cell lines. We investigate the predictive power of the recently proposed comboKR method, which is based on a powerful input-output kernel regression technique and functional modeling of the response surface. In this work, we develop a scaled-up formulation of the comboKR, which also implements improved modeling choices: we (1) incorporate new modeling choices for the output drug combination response surfaces to the comboKR framework, and (2) propose a projected gradient descent method to solve the challenging pre-image problem that is traditionally solved with simple candidate set approaches. We provide thorough experimental analysis of comboKR 2.0 with three real-word datasets within various challenging experimental settings, including cases where drugs or cell lines have not been encountered in the training data. Our comparison with synergy score prediction methods further highlights the relevance of dose-response prediction approaches, instead of relying on simple scoring methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.