ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2025
Influence of Age and Central Hypertension on the Form Factor Needed to Estimate Mean Aortic Pressure, and Its Implications for Pulse Pressure Amplification: A Secondary Data Analysis.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Thrombectomy Pulse Pressure Trajectories and Outcomes in Middle-Aged and Older Stroke Patients.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Age- and Blood Pressure-Dependent Form Factors: Reevaluating Arterial Waveforms and Blood Pressure Assessment.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMean aortic pressure (MAP) plays a pivotal role in both cardiovascular dynamics and the noninvasive estimation of systolic aortic pressure. MAP can be estimated by adding a fraction of the pulse pressure (PP) to the diastolic aortic pressure, known as the form factor (FF=100×[MAP-diastolic aortic pressure]/PP). A 41.2% FF is recommended, yet this single value may not adequately account for age- and pressure-related changes in both pressure waveform and central-to-peripheral pulse pressure amplification (pulse pressure amplification=peripheral PP/central PP=central FF/peripheral FF). METHODS AND
resultsThis secondary analysis included data extracted from 11 high-fidelity invasive pressure studies. Individual data on age, high-fidelity systolic aortic pressure, diastolic aortic pressure, and time-averaged MAP were reanalyzed to calculate FF values and assess the influence of age and central hypertension on FF. The pooled data included 320 adults, comprising our own database (n=139). Among them, 97 subjects were initially categorized as "normal," 82 with hypertension, and 141 with diverse cardiac conditions (median age, 48 years; MAP, 102 mm Hg). The FF value (mean, 44%) decreased with age (
conclusionsAortic FF decreased with age and was lower in subjects with central hypertension. Unlike applying a fixed FF, this decline aligned with pathophysiological changes in pressure waveform and pulse pressure amplification, with potential implications for improving MAP estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.