ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025
Proteomic Analyses of Clots Identify Stroke Etiologies in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.
Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clot Composition and Ischemic Stroke Etiology: A Contemporary Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Emerging biomarkers in ischemic stroke.Vessel plus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThis study aimed to investigate the correlation between clot composition and stroke mechanisms in patients undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT), using proteomic analysis.
methodsThis study included 35 patients with ischemic stroke (cardioembolism [CE], n = 17; large artery atherosclerosis [LAA], n = 6; cancer-related [CR], n = 4; and undetermined (UD) cause, n = 8) who underwent EVT. Retrieved clots were proteomically analyzed to identify differentially expressed proteins associated with the three stroke mechanisms and to develop the machine learning model.
resultsIn the discover stage, 3838 proteins were identified using clot samples from 27 patients with CE, LAA, and CR mechanisms. Through functional enrichment and network analysis, 149 proteins were identified as potential candidates for verification studies. After verification experiments, 34 proteins were selected as the final candidates to predict stroke mechanisms. Furthermore, the machine learning-based model identified three proteins associated with each mechanism (Pleckstrin in CE; CD59 glycoprotein in LAA; and Immunoglobulin Heavy Constant Gamma 1 in CR) in the UD group.
conclusionsThis study identified specific protein markers of clots that could differentiate stroke mechanisms in patients undergoing EVT. Therefore, our results could offer valuable insights into elucidating the mechanisms of ischemic stroke, which could provide information on more effective secondary prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.