ArticleJournal of hypertension2025
Haemodynamic changes from prepregnancy to very early pregnancy among women planning to conceive in Southwestern Uganda.
Article in Journal of hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of the associations between office and home BP with placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: the BOSHI study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNormal pregnancy is associated with cardiovascular changes that enable adaptation to the pregnancy state. We sought to describe the haemodynamic changes from prepregnancy to very early pregnancy in women planning to conceive in southwestern Uganda.
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, we enrolled women in southwestern Uganda planning to conceive. Brachial and central blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, stroke volume, and peripheral vascular resistance were assessed prepregnancy and repeated in very early pregnancy.
resultsWe studied 86 women with a mean age of 27.8 years (SD ± 4.4). The mean gestational age was 7 (±2) weeks at the time of repeat blood pressure measurement. Brachial systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in very early pregnancy (116 ± 11 to 114 ± 8 mmHg and 68 ± 6 to 65 ± 5 mmHg, respectively; P < 0.001). Central systolic and diastolic blood pressure also decreased (112 ± 10 to 109 ± 8 mmHg, P = 0.003 and 68 ± 6 to 65 ± 5 mmHg, P < 0.001, respectively), as did peripheral vascular resistance (1450 ± 581 to 1311 ± 276 dyn/s/cm 5P = 0.038). There was no significant difference in cardiac output (5.3 ± 1.2 vs 5.5 ± 1.1 l/min P = 0.146) or stroke volume (64 ± 13 to 66 ± 12 ml, P = 0.172).
conclusionSignificant haemodynamic changes occur in very early pregnancy. Using late first trimester measurements as a baseline for pregnancy induced changes may not be suitable for understanding the full extent of pregnancy induced haemodynamic changes, or provide a reliable substitute for prepregnancy states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.