ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Global Insights on the Involvement of Ethnic Minority Populations in Health and Social Care Research Priority Setting: A Systematic Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Migration and health: a human rights perspective - conference insights and beyond.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRepresenting all population groups in health and social care research is essential for generating research relevant to decision making in everyday clinical and social healthcare policy and practice. Conducting research that is relevant to all, starts with ensuring equitable representation in research priority selection. This scoping review aimed to identify evidence of published and good practices in health and social care research priority-setting activities, which included people from ethnic minority backgrounds.
methodsThe search was conducted using MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline. Studies that reported including ethnic minority community members in health and social care research priority setting from 2010 were considered. The research priority processes were evaluated using a checklist of good practices in research priority settings.
findingsForty-seven articles representing 12 countries and various health topics were included. Group discussion was the most common approach for conducting the research priority setting activities. No study addressed all 20 recommended research priority-setting good practice principles. Most studies provided sufficient information about the context of the priority-setting exercise. Examples of good practices included community advisory boards, local approaches to health research, and multi-disciplinary steering groups.
conclusionRepresentation of ethnic minority populations' involvement in research across different countries and broader health and social care areas is limited. Recommendations to address these challenges are presented and could help inform researchers, funders, and policymakers to understand what health and social care research topics are prioritised by ethnic minority communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.