SynthesisPloS one2025
Pooled prevalence and associated factors of ECG abnormality among type 2 diabetic patients in the last ten years: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus is a global epidemic affecting millions of individuals worldwide. It is considered a chronic metabolic disorder of impaired glucose homeostasis, associated with various long-term complications and poor prognosis of cardiovascular performance. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of ECG abnormality among type 2 diabetic patients both in the hospital setting and the general population based on the existing literature.
methodsThis systematic review has been conducted on the ECG abnormality of patients with Type 2 diabetes. Following the establishment of eligibility criteria, a literature search was conducted using three databases and two search engines. Included articles were then screened, critically appraised, and data extracted independently by two reviewers, and any disagreements were handled by the involvement of a third party. The quality of the included studies had been assessed using the New Castle Ottawa quality assessment scale tool. Pooled prevalence and sensitivity were determined by random effect analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed by Higgins's I2, and its presence was alleviated by using sub-group analysis.
resultFollowing the identification of 32, 785 studies, 33 publications were eligible for the review with a sample size of 31, 449. The pooled prevalence of ECG abnormality among Type 2 diabetic patients was 31% (95% CI: 25, 36%). It was 26% (95% CI: 1, 51%), and 31% (95% CI: 24, 37%) in the hospital and general/ community population, respectively. Body mass index (AOR = 5.90; 95%CI: 4.96, 7.03), duration of diabetic mellitus (AOR = 9.21; 95%CI: 9.12, 9.31), and being hypertensive (AOR = 5.17; 95%CI: 4.90, 5.46), were significantly associated factors with ECG abnormality among patients with Type 2 diabetic mellitus.
conclusionThe pooled prevalence of ECG abnormality among Type 2 diabetic mellitus patients was high, while its magnitude was higher among patients attending hospital settings than in the community. Duration of diabetic mellitus, high body mass index and presence of hypertension were significant factors in this review. Moreover, we advise more longitudinal researches to determine the incidence of ECG abnormality among patients with diabetes considering time duration and sex differences. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION: Since our study was on the review of secondary data, ethical issues are not necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.