ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
Degree of Joint Risk Factor Control and Incident Fracture Outcomes in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.
Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Degree of Joint Risk Factor Control and Incident Fracture Outcomes in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextIndividuals with type 2 diabetes have a higher fracture risk than the general population. However, the association between joint risk factor control and fracture risk in this population remains unclear.
objectiveTo investigate the extent to which joint risk factor control might attenuate the excess risk of fracture outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
methodsWe included 8935 individuals with type 2 diabetes and 35 740 matched controls without fractures at baseline from the UK Biobank (UKB), with a median follow-up of 12.1 years. Six modifiable risk factors were assessed: body mass index (BMI), physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations between risk factor control and fracture risk.
resultsControlling each additional risk factor resulted in a 14% to 26% decrease in fracture risk. Optimal control (≥5 risk factors) correlated with a 50% reduction in overall fractures (HR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33-0.75). However, a 60% reduction in hip fractures (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.98) was observed with the control of 4 risk factors. With control of 4 or more risk factors, fracture risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes was comparable to that of nondiabetic controls, and the protective effect was stronger in men than in women.
conclusionJoint risk factor control was significantly linked to a reduced fracture risk, and optimal management may eliminate the excess fracture risk associated with type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.