ArticleJCO oncology practice2025
System-Level Transformations to Increase Patient Participation in Clinical Trials.
Article in JCO oncology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOver the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Food and Drug Administration allowed cancer clinical trials to make modifications. As policymakers consider sustaining these modifications, understanding patient perspectives on impact is critical.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used survey data collected between August 2021 and September 2021 by the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium and December 2022 by Patient Advocate Foundation among female breast cancer survivors. Respondents reported how changes to location, telemedicine, convenience, and opting out of certain procedures would affect their willingness to participate in a trial. Respondents' county-level vulnerability was determined using five-digit Federal Information Processing Standard codes to link to the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) overall theme (range, 0-1). According to the SVI, the most vulnerable counties are those in the upper 10% of the overall theme. Model-estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated using multinomial logistic regression models to explore the association between county-level social vulnerability and willingness to participate.
resultsOverall, 573 women were included, 12% lived in the most vulnerable counties, and 18% had previous trial participation. Over half (53%) reported that they would be very willing to participate in a trial that offered medication delivery to the home. When compared with all other counties, respondents in most vulnerable counties did not have increased willingness to participate in a trial using telemedicine (OR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.63]). Results were similar for all other trial modifications, though not statistically significant.
conclusionOur sample of breast cancer survivors viewed trial modifications favorably. However, respondents in the most vulnerable counties were less likely to be influenced by these modifications. Research is needed to understand if additional modifications would influence participation of this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.