ArticleScientific reports2025
Intraoperative use of high-speed Raman spectroscopy during soft tissue sarcoma resection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review of Margin Identification Methods in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Modelling of immune infiltration in prostate cancer treated with HDR-brachytherapy using Raman spectroscopy and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Raman Monitoring ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RSTS) is a rare type of cancer with limited treatment options. Achieving complete resection with negative margins is one of the most significant prognostic factors for RSTS survival. The UltraProbe is a handheld point probe Raman spectroscopy system that significantly decreases the imaging time compared to the probe systems currently used. This study aims to determine the performance of the UltraProbe in detecting STS in an in vivo environment during their resection. Thirty patients were recruited at Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal, Canada. Raman spectra were acquired during STS resection using the instrument. A machine learning random forest classification algorithm was developed to predict the diagnosis associated with new Raman spectra: STS or healthy tissue. The classification of Raman spectra as well-differentiated liposarcomas or normal adipose tissue was performed with a sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 95%, and accuracy of 94%. The classification of spectra as well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcomas or normal adipose tissue was performed with a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 93%, and accuracy of 90%. The classification of spectra as non-liposarcoma STS or protein-rich non-adipose tissue was performed with a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 81%, and accuracy of 87%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.