Evidence mapPaperPMID 40083094Full record

SynthesisJournal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association2025

Determination of Burn Size in Mouse Models of Burn Injury: A Scoping Review of Studies Leveraging Scald and Contact Burns.

Meagan S Kingren, Mary Barre, Abby Barlow, Jaycelyn S Hall, Ansley Varisco, Craig Porter

Abstract readScoping ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meagan S KingrenUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9262-2936
Mary BarreArkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States.
Abby BarlowArkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States.
Jaycelyn S HallUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2563-6158
Ansley VariscoArkansas Children's Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-7780-344X
Craig PorterUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3657-6645

Funding

The Role of the Mitochondrion in the Metabolic Stress Response to Burn TraumaR35GM142744 · ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RES INST · 2025 to 2025
$497k
Arkansas Bioscience InstituteNational Institutes of General Medical Sciences R35GM142744NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM142744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burns are a leading cause of nonfatal injury worldwide and leave survivors with significant complications, including prolonged hypermetabolism. Rodent models are commonly used to better understand the molecular underpinnings of burn injury. However, there is a lack of congruency in methodological reporting standards, particularly with regard to the reporting of burn size. We undertook a scoping review to identify gaps in the methodological reporting in mouse burn model literature. Full-text English peer-reviewed articles were included if they utilized a scald or contact burn to the dorsal and/or ventral sides of mice. Of the 7073 queried articles, 1057 met our inclusion criteria. Basic animal characteristics such as mouse sex, strain, age, and body mass were excluded in several papers, where only ~34% of included papers reported all 4 details. Roughly half of the papers reviewed did not report absolute burn size (~53%) or the measured/calculated total body surface area (TBSA) of mice, typically reporting relative burn size as a percentage of TBSA only. Furthermore, the use of different k-constants in TBSA calculations created significant variation, thereby leading to ~20% differences in relative burn sizes in similarly sized/aged mice. Regardless of whether mice were randomized to experimental groups, the method of randomization and key husbandry variables were infrequently reported. In order to promote rigor, reproducibility, and translatability, preclinical models of burn injury studies should adhere to the essential 10 of the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and also report absolute burn sizes and the TBSA of mice.

Indexed as

BurnsDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsBody Surface AreaMiceburn injury modelscontact burnscald burn

Identifiers

PMID40083094
PMCPMC13031109

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.