Observational studyAnnals of medicine2025
Reliability and validity of the Geriatric Self-Care Scale among Chinese older adults.
Observational study in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between oropharyngeal dysphagia and functional constipation in older adults: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- How urban versus rural residency relates to basic activities of daily living among older people in Central China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multiple mediators of anxiety and depression between living space and cognitive function among elderly patients with ischemic stroke.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the Geriatric Self-Care Scale (GSS) has been widely used in community investigations in China, its reliability and validity have yet to be analyzed.
objectivesThis study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the GSS in community-dwelling Chinese older adults.
methodsThis prospective observational study included 29428 older adults. Content validity was analyzed using the Content Validity Index (CVI). Reliability analysis included internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Differences in participants who could live independently versus those who could not were analyzed for discriminant validity. The Barthel Index was used as the gold standard. Spearman's correlation and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis were used to assess convergent validity.
resultsThe CVI for the GSS was 0.920, with CVI values of 1.000, 0.900, 1.000, 0.800 and 0.900. The Cronbach's alpha for the GSS was 0.869 (for all participants) and 0.867 (for participants aged ≥ 65 years) and the item Cronbach's alpha coefficients were all >0.8. The Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients for both the scale and each item were greater than 0.8. There were significant differences (
conclusionsThe GSS showed good reliability and validity among community-dwelling older adults in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.