Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083366›Full record

ArticleUniversal access in the information society2025

The smart home, a true home? How new technologies disrupt the experience of home for older persons.

Nadine Andrea Felber, Hamed Alavi, Elena Mugellini, Tenzin Wangmo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Universal access in the information society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadine Andrea FelberInstitute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8207-2996
Hamed AlaviDigital Interactions Lab, Institute of Informatics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8443-7514
Elena MugelliniHumanTech - Technology for Human Wellbeing Institute, Haute École Spécialisée de Suisse Occidentale, Delémont, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0775-0862
Tenzin WangmoInstitute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-0510

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart home technologies (SHTs) can support older persons to age in place. However, adoption of SHTs remains low among this population. A reason for this is that they are not accustomed to having a home that is technologically enhanced. In this article, we focus on the older persons' lived experience of "home" and show how SHTs potentially disrupt it. In consulting the currently available literature, both theoretical and empirical, we propose and use the concept of somatic capability assessment (SCA) in the discussion surrounding the design of SHTs for older persons. First, we propose SCA as a concept to grasp how humans take decisions while relying on their physical body, undisturbed by suggestions from technologies. Furthermore, we show that SCA functions best in a familiar and private environment-the home. SHTs have the potential to make the home seem unfamiliar and exposed, precisely through added data and the resulting suggestions, as we show through related empirical studies. Thus, SHTs hold an increased disruptive potential for older persons at home. By introducing SCA into the discussion of SHTs for older persons, and thus paying attention on how SHTs potentially disrupt the experience of home, further advances the ethical discussion on the adequate use and design of technologies in daily life, especially for the group of older persons. Our analysis offers important insights for the design and implementation processes of SHTs for older persons.

Indexed as

Aging in placeHealth technologiesOlder personsSmart homeTechnology design

Identifiers

PMID40083366
PMCPMC11897077

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.