ArticleJournal of public health in Africa2025
Acceptability of the social uses of the COVID-19 screening test among women in southern Benin.
Article in Journal of public health in Africa, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Screening tests are some of the essential measures in the fight against all diseases with epidemic potential. The refusal to use it is the major challenge that hinders this fight. Aim: This article aims to highlight the factors for the rejection of the COVID-19 screening test among women in the informal sector in Benin. Setting: The data were collected in southern Benin. Methods: A cross-sectional approach was used to collect data in two areas (intervention area and buffer zone). The sample was drawn using a two-stage random sampling design. In the first stage, primary sampling units or clusters or villages or neighbourhoods were drawn, and in the second stage, 40 households were selected by primary sampling units. Overall, 2500 households per area in which about 2500 women aged 15-64 years were interviewed. Descriptive and explanatory analyses were carried out. Results: The results show that a strong majority (84.2%) of respondents showed aversion to the COVID-19 screening test. Individual factors (age, level of education, religion) and contextual factors (sectors and types of activities of the respondents) are the main reasons behind this refusal. Conclusion: Insufficient consideration of local contexts around health emergencies, infodemia and social inequalities in health have contributed to aversion to the COVID-19 screening test. Contribution: The results call on public authorities to support a constant improvement of knowledge on COVID-19 taking into account local approaches to facilitate the adherence of populations to the screening test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.