Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40083773›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied phycology2025

The influence of seeding method and water depth on the morphology and biomass yield of farmed sugar kelp (

Catherine M Wilding, Kathryn E Smith, Carly L Daniels, Jessica Knoop, Dan A Smale

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied phycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine M WildingSchool of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE1 7RU UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7641-8225
Kathryn E SmithMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7240-1490
Carly L DanielsCollege of Maths Science and Engineering, The University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9EZ UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3356-7671
Jessica KnoopPhycology Research Group, Department of Science, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9374-0179
Dan A SmaleMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4157-541X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seaweed farming is a rapidly growing global industry, driven by increasing demand for biomass with a range of commercial applications. A major barrier limiting expansion of the industry is the need for cost-effective approaches to production. Established twine seeding methods are reliable, but recently developed binder methods offer potential scalability while minimising hatchery costs. Here, we compared growth of the farmed kelp

Indexed as

BinderPheophyceaeSeaweed farmingSeeding techniqueTwineVertical cultivation

Identifiers

PMID40083773
PMCPMC11897108

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.