ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Association between female waist-hip ratio and live birth in patients undergoing
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic state and female fertility in ART cycles: a summary of current advances.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Maternal obesity is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. It negatively affects IVF/ICSI outcomes and offspring health. However, it is unclear whether waist-hip ratio (WHR) has an impact on outcomes of Methods: A retrospective cohort study screened 943 patients who underwent IVF/ICSI treatment between February and June 2020 in Shanghai, China, and 828 patients were finally included in the analyses. The body weight, height, waist circumference and hip circumference were measured before ovarian stimulation, and their IVF/ICSI outcomes were followed up. The cut-off point of WHR was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Live birth rate from the first embryo transfer cycle was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included cumulative live birth, miscarriage rate and birthweight. Results: Women with relatively high WHR (≥0.783) showed lower live birth rate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.657, 95%CI: 0.466-0.926), lower cumulative live birth rate (aOR: 0.580, 95%CI: 0.413-0.814), and higher miscarriage rate (aOR=2.865, 95%CI: 1.300-6.316) as compared with those with low WHR (<0.783), independently of BMI. Joint WHR and BMI analyses showed that, compared with the reference group (those with low WHR and normal weight), those with high WHR and normal BMI had lower live birth rate (aOR=0.653, 95%CI: 0.447-0.954) and cumulative live birth rate (aOR=0.600, 95%CI: 0.413-0.872), and higher miscarriage rate (aOR=2.865, 95%CI: 1.229-6.676), Whereas the patients with both high WHR and high BMI only showed a significant lower cumulative live birth rate (aOR=0.612, 95%CI: 0.404-0.926). Moreover, there was no significant association between BMI and pregnancy outcomes, or between maternal WHR and birth weights. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that higher WHR was associated with lower fecundability in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles, independently of BMI. Interestingly, the adverse effects of central obesity were more evident in patients with lower BMI. Thus WHR appears to be a better predictor of female fertility treatment outcomes as compared with BMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.