ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2025
Circulatory CCL2 distinguishes Duchenne muscular dystrophy dogs.
Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Serum protein biomarker signature of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.European journal of translational myology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To establish a minimally invasive approach to studying body-wide muscle inflammation in the canine Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) model, we evaluated 13 cytokines/chemokines in frozen sera from 90 affected (239 sera) and 73 normal (189 sera) dogs (0.00 to 45.2 months of age). Linear mixed-effects model analysis suggested that ten cytokines/chemokines were significantly elevated in affected dogs, including interleukin (IL)-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, IL-18, C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Further, cytokine/chemokine elevation coincided with the onset of muscle disease. Importantly, only CCL2 showed consistent changes at all ages, with the most pronounced increase occurring between 3 and 9 months. To study the effects of sample storage and type, we compared fresh versus frozen, and serum versus plasma, samples from the same dog. Similar readings were often obtained in fresh and frozen sera. Although plasma readings were significantly lower for many cytokines/chemokines, this did not compromise the robustness of CCL2 as a biomarker. Our study establishes a baseline for using circulatory cytokines/chemokines as biomarkers in canine DMD studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.