ArticleScientific reports2025
Improved glycemic outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes using smart blood glucose monitoring integrated with popular digital health therapeutics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation outcomes of video-observed oral fluid self-collection for drug testing in substance use disorder treatment: a pilot study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Self-Management Behaviours in Type 2 Diabetes Across Gulf Cooperation Council Countries: An Updated Narrative Review to Enhance Patient Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes places a burden on healthcare systems, necessitating cost-effective, engaging and accessible interventions to address the underlying behavioral and lifestyle drivers. Our study evaluated combining Bluetooth connected OneTouch blood glucose meters (BGM) and the OneTouch Reveal mobile app with one of four digital therapeutic apps. Each group was independent, with people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) themselves choosing their therapeutic intervention, to better reflect real-world use. Our 3-month decentralized study screened 912 subjects, with 612 returning mail-in A1cs, providing 191 subjects (Noom = 68, Fitbit = 31, Cecelia Health = 47, Welldoc = 45) who met all inclusion criteria, including entry A1c 7.5 to 12.0%. The primary endpoint of A1c change showed improvement in the overall group by - 0.77% (95% CI - 0.98 to - 0.56, n = 141) after 3-months, Noom - 1.03% (CI - 1.4 to - 0.61, n = 49), Fitbit - 0.56% (CI - 1.0 to - 0.11, n = 24), Cecelia Health - 0.76% (CI - 1.2 to - 0.36, n = 36), Welldoc - 0.55% (CI - 0.94 to - 0.17, n = 32). In terms of secondary endpoints, more than half (56%) of these PwT2D lowered A1c by ≥ 0.5% and more than a third (36%) lowered A1c by ≥ 1.0%, with similar improvements across each of the four independent groups. Our real-world approach shows the potential for connected BGMs and widely accessible digital therapeutics to contribute to improvements in glycemic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.