Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40088002›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2025

Refinement and Validation of a New Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Hearing Loss (My Hearing PREM).

Sian K Smith, Helen Pryce, Georgina Burns O'Connell, Rebecca C Knibb, Rosemary Greenwood

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Implementation of My Hearing PREM Into Three UK Audiology Services: A Pluralist Approach to Planning, Design and Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sian K SmithSchool of Optometry, College of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Helen PryceSchool of Optometry, College of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Georgina Burns O'ConnellSchool of Optometry, College of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Rebecca C KnibbSchool of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5561-0904
Rosemary GreenwoodUniversity Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK.

Funding

This study is supported by an NIHR HSDR grant (Funding stream REF NIHR 131597), the University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, and Aston University (Applied Audiology research group, College of Health and Life Sciences).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPatient-reported experience measures (PREMs) generate insights into daily challenges experienced when living with a chronic condition and experiences of care. There are no validated PREMs to measure the experience of hearing loss.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a newly developed tool, 'My Hearing PREM', designed to assess the experience of living with hearing loss and receiving audiology care. SETTING AND

participantsAdults with hearing loss (n = 401) were recruited from audiology clinics in Scotland and England, and non-clinical routes such as lip-reading classes, clinical research networks, national charity links and social media.

designParticipants completed a 27-item PREM alongside validated scales to measure communication difficulties, loneliness, quality of life, decisional conflict and health literacy. Modern (Rasch) and traditional psychometric analysis techniques (internal consistency and construct validity) were used to assess the psychometric properties of the My Hearing PREM.

resultsFactor analysis of the initial 27 items produced 3 subscales: Emotional Burden, Support and Communication, after 4 items were removed due to poor fit. Rasch analysis was carried out on each of these subscales and a further 7 items with poor fit to the Rasch model were removed. This resulted in a long-form 16-item (My Hearing PREM-16) demonstrating good internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.91). Each subscale showed good internal reliability (0.91, 0.85 and 0.71). A short-form (My Hearing PREM-9) version was developed for use in clinical practice (α = 0.79). Both forms of the PREM demonstrated medium to strong significant correlations with the validated measures.

conclusionBoth the My Hearing PREM-16 and My Hearing PREM-9 are reliable measures with good construct validity. They provide a way for healthcare professionals to understand how hearing loss is affecting an individual's emotional well-being, social interactions and communication. Ongoing research is exploring the feasibility of My Hearing PREM in routine audiology practice. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: We developed the project in collaboration with members of the public who have lived experience of hearing loss, recruited through Aston University and volunteer networks connected to audiology services. Additionally, we engaged with individuals more likely to be impacted by hearing loss, including adults with learning disabilities, older adults in residential care, and members of South Asian communities (Bangladeshi, Indian and Pakistani). These stakeholders provided valuable feedback on the study's aims, the content and format of the My Hearing PREM items, the survey design and recruitment strategies.

Indexed as

Hearing LossPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsScotlandaudiologyhearing losspatient‐reported experience measure (PREM)psychometric analysisquestionnaire validationRasch analysisself‐report measure

Identifiers

PMID40088002
PMCPMC11909470

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.