Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40088270›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2025

The accuracy of fixed intensity anchors to estimate lactate thresholds in recreational runners.

Olli-Pekka Nuuttila, Piia Kaikkonen, Harri Sievänen, Tommi Vasankari, Heikki Kyröläinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olli-Pekka NuuttilaThe UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, 33500, Tampere, Finland. olli-pekka.nuuttila@ukkinstituutti.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4819-0619
Piia KaikkonenTampere Research Center of Sports Medicine, UKK Institute, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, 33500, Tampere, Finland.
Harri SievänenThe UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, 33500, Tampere, Finland.
Tommi VasankariThe UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Kaupinpuistonkatu 1, 33500, Tampere, Finland.
Heikki KyröläinenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndurance exercise intensities can be categorized into moderate, heavy, and severe domains based on physiological responses during incremental exercise testing. Since the evaluation of metabolic thresholds is not always possible, this study assessed the accuracy of fixed intensity anchors to estimate lactate thresholds.

methods165 (64 females, 101 males) recreational runners performed a maximal incremental treadmill test. The first (LT1) and second (LT2) lactate thresholds were determined as percentages of maximum heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (VO

resultsFemales had a higher relative HR, VO

conclusionLT1 occurred at higher relative intensity in females, suggesting a need for sex-specific intensity anchors. The speed-derived estimates were the most accurate, but the estimation of maximum values impaired the prediction accuracy. Thus, the optimal method also depends on the availability of the maximum values.

Indexed as

Anaerobic ThresholdLactic AcidRunningAdultExercise TestFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygen ConsumptionPhysical EndurancePhysical ExertionLactic AcidEndurance trainingExercise prescriptionLactate thresholdMetabolic threshold

Identifiers

PMID40088270
PMCPMC12354492

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.