ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
Improving patient clustering by incorporating structured variable label relationships in similarity measures.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient stratification is the cornerstone of numerous health investigations, serving to enhance the estimation of treatment efficacy and facilitating patient matching. To stratify patients, similarity measures between patients can be computed from clinical variables contained in medical health records. These variables have both values and labels structured in ontologies or other classification systems. The relevance of considering variable label relationships in the computation of patient similarity measures has been poorly studied.
objectiveWe adapt and evaluate several weighted versions of the Cosine similarity in order to consider structured label relationships to compute patient similarities from a medico-administrative database. MATERIALS AND
methodsAs a use case, we clustered patients aged 60 years from their annual medicine reimbursements contained in the Échantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires, a random sample of a French medico-administrative database. We used four patient similarity measures: the standard Cosine similarity, a weighted Cosine similarity measure that includes variable frequencies and two weighted Cosine similarity measures that consider variable label relationships. We construct patient networks from each similarity measure and identify clusters of patients using the Markov Cluster algorithm. We evaluate the performance of the different similarity measures with enrichment tests based on patient diagnoses.
resultsThe weighted similarity measures that include structured variable label relationships perform better to identify similar patients. Indeed, using these weighted measures, we identify more clusters associated with different diagnose enrichment. Importantly, the enrichment tests provide clinically interpretable insights into these patient clusters.
conclusionConsidering label relationships when computing patient similarities improves stratification of patients regarding their health status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.