ArticleHepatology international2025
Explainable attention-enhanced heuristic paradigm for multi-view prognostic risk score development in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in Hepatology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From black-box prediction to transparent insight: the status quo and paradigm shift of explainable artificial intelligence in hepatocellular carcinoma research.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeExisting prognostic staging systems depend on expensive manual extraction by pathologists, potentially overlooking latent patterns critical for prognosis, or use black-box deep learning models, limiting clinical acceptance. This study introduces a novel deep learning-assisted paradigm that complements existing approaches by generating interpretable, multi-view risk scores to stratify prognostic risk in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
methods510 HCC patients were enrolled in an internal dataset (SYSUCC) as training and validation cohorts to develop the Hybrid Deep Score (HDS). The Attention Activator (ATAT) was designed to heuristically identify tissues with high prognostic risk, and a multi-view risk-scoring system based on ATAT established HDS from microscopic to macroscopic levels. HDS was also validated on an external testing cohort (TCGA-LIHC) with 341 HCC patients. We assessed prognostic significance using Cox regression and the concordance index (c-index).
resultsThe ATAT first heuristically identified regions where necrosis, lymphocytes, and tumor tissues converge, particularly focusing on their junctions in high-risk patients. From this, this study developed three independent risk factors: microscopic morphological, co-localization, and deep global indicators, which were concatenated and then input into a neural network to generate the final HDS for each patient. The HDS demonstrated competitive results with hazard ratios (HR) (HR 3.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.91-5.43 in SYSUCC; HR 2.34, 95% CI 1.58-3.47 in TCGA-LIHC) and c-index values (0.751 in SYSUCC; 0.729 in TCGA-LIHC) for Disease-Free Survival (DFS). Furthermore, integrating HDS into existing clinical staging systems allows for more refined stratification, which enables the identification of potential high-risk patients within low-risk groups.
conclusionThis novel paradigm, from identifying high-risk tissues to constructing prognostic risk scores, offers fresh insights into HCC research. Additionally, the integration of HDS complements the existing clinical staging system by facilitating more detailed stratification in DFS and Overall Survival (OS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.