ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2025
Diagnosis of bovine rotavirus: an overview of currently available methods.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation and Identification of G8P[1] Bovine Rotavirus A Among Neonatal Diarrheic Calves in Yunnan, China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Molecular epidemiology of group A rotavirus (RVA) and bovine coronavirus (BCoV) associated with neonatal calf diarrhea in Türkiye.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- A DPO-Enhanced Gold Nanoparticle-Assisted PCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Bovine Viral Diarrhea Virus, Astrovirus, and Rotavirus.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Research Progress and Applications of the Rotavirus Reverse Genetics System.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Isolation, Identification, and Comprehensive Genomic Characterization of a Bovine Rotavirus G10P[11] Strain in China.Polish journal of microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bovine rotavirus (BRV) is a significant pathogen that causes diarrhea in calves, profoundly impacting the cattle industry and resulting in substantial economic losses. Currently, the established diagnostic approaches for BRV primarily include etiological methods, such as electron microscopy, virus isolation, and culture; serological methods, including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), latex agglutination test (LAT), and immunofluorescence techniques; and molecular biological methods, such as reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), as well as next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology. This review summarizes the current diagnostic methods for BRV, discusses their advantages and disadvantages, and presents future perspectives on BRV diagnosis, aiming to provide valuable references for the effective diagnosis and control of BRV-related diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.