ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Effect of proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole) on adverse drug reactions and rational drug use in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and rationale of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for adverse drug reactions in elderly patients with heart failure (HF).
methodsFrom February 2019 to September 2021, 120 elderly patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) treated at Jintan First People's Hospital were enrolled as subjects. The patients were classified into a control group (n=60) and a research group (n=60). In addition to clopidogrel, the control group received cimetidine, while the research group received lansoprazole. Clinical efficacy, oxidative stress markers, echocardiographic indices, vascular endothelial function, cardiac function indicators, and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed, and risk factors affecting patient efficacy were examined.
resultsThe clinical efficacy of the research group was remarkably superior to that of the control group (88.33% versus 63.33%, P<0.05). The combination of clopidogrel and cimetidine was identified as a risk factor affecting patient efficacy (P=0.003). Besides, the research group showed significant elevation in superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and nitric oxide (NO) after treatment, all higher compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Additionally, significant reductions in malondialdehyde (MDA), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end systolic dimension (LVSD), endothelin-1 (ET-1), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and free fatty acids (FFA) were observed in the research group, all lower than the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of bradycardia, hypotension and electrolyte disturbances in the research group was remarkably lower (P<0.05). Additionally, the research group demonstrated greater cost-effectiveness compared to the control group.
conclusionThe use of PPIs in elderly patients with HF not only improves efficacy but also enhances safety, making this drug treatment approach worth promoting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.