ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Physiological outcomes of physical activity interventions in persistent postconcussive symptoms: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physiological Outcomes of Physical Activity Interventions in Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are limited therapeutic options for patients with persistent postconcussive symptoms (PPCSs). Most PPCS assessments focus on subjective measures of progression and symptom monitoring. While early exercise interventions for rehabilitation are now considered best practice for acute concussion, no comprehensive review exists on how physical activity objectively and physiologically affects outcomes in PPCS. This scoping review protocol outlines the methods to identify the efficacy of therapeutic exercise interventions for PPCS, emphasising their impact on physiological parameters, including cardiovascular autonomic responses and cerebral autoregulation. Using the Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) framework, we will include all studies presenting original data. Narrative summaries will provide clinicians. An initial search in Medline/EMBASE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus will be completed. Key parameters from each study will be extracted, tabulated and discussed in a narrative inquiry. The study references will be reviewed for additional studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Future research applications from the findings will be emphasised. After completion of the review, the results will be stratified by type of physical activity as the intervention, emphasising the physiological outcomes. Mapping these findings will allow us to identify the key research priorities for future studies. Findings will be shared with PPCS practitioners and local/national committees and submitted for conferences and publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.