Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40093757›Full record

ReviewIMA fungus2025



Hedda Schrey, Christopher Lambert, Marc Stadler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IMA fungus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New sordarialean lineageIMA fungus · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Detection ofAnnals of Saudi medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hedda SchreyDepartment Microbial Drugs (MWIS), Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research Braunschweig Germany.
Christopher LambertDepartment Microbial Drugs (MWIS), Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research Braunschweig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1899-8214
Marc StadlerDepartment Microbial Drugs (MWIS), Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research Braunschweig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-8671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural product discovery from fungi for drug development and description of novel chemistry has been a tremendous success. This success is expected to accelerate even further, owing to the advent of sophisticated technical advances of technical advances that recently led to the discovery of an unparalleled biodiversity in the fungal kingdom. This review aims to give an overview on i) important secondary metabolite-derived drugs or drug leads, ii) discuss the analytical and strategic framework of how natural product discovery and drug lead identification transformed from earlier days to the present, iii) how knowledge of fungal biology and biodiversity facilitates the discovery of new compounds, and iv) point out endeavors in understanding fungal secondary metabolite chemistry in order to systematically explore fungal genomes by utilizing synthetic biology. An outlook is given, underlining the necessity for a collaborative and cooperative scenario to harness the full potential of the fungal secondary metabolome.

Indexed as

Analyticsantibioticsbioprospectingbiosynthesischemotaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID40093757
PMCPMC11909596

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.