Observational studyGlobal heart2025
Characterization of 2,500 Patients with Heart Failure and Analysis of Their Optimal Medical Therapy: Insights from the AMERICCAASS Registry.
Observational study in Global heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comorbidity Clusters in Acute Heart Failure: Insights From the AMERICCAASS Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Observational
- Heart failure in Kenya: epidemiology, management patterns, and outcomes from a national multicenter registry.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Observational
- Risk factors for in-hospital mortality in acute heart failure, a cross-sectional study.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of hospitalization and mortality worldwide, emphasizing the critical role of optimal medical therapy (OMT) in improving patient outcomes. Despite extensive research, most scientific evidence regarding HF is gathered and studied in developed countries, leaving substantial knowledge gaps regarding HF in Latin America and the Caribbean. Objective: To characterize the sociodemographic and clinical profiles of HF patients and to assess their adherence to OMT in the Americas. Methods: The AMERICCAASS Registry is a prospective, observational, multicenter study, including patients aged 18 and older, both hospitalized and ambulatory, and diagnosed with HF. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from the first 2,500 patients to characterize the study population. Adherence to OMT was subsequently evaluated according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: Among the 2,500 patients in the study, 36% were hospitalized and 64% were ambulatory. The median ages of the patients were 66.9 (hospitalized) and 66.3 years (ambulatory). Males made up 60.8% of hospitalized and 59.3% of ambulatory patients. The majority had HF with reduced LVEF (≤40%): 60.7% for hospitalized and 58.5% for ambulatory. The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II predominated among ambulatory patients (67.9%), while NYHA functional class III predominated among hospitalized patients (46.6%). Only 21% of patients with reduced LVEF were receiving quadruple therapy, whereas 12.3% of patients with mildly reduced LVEF (41-49%) were on this treatment. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that the sociodemographic and clinical profiles of HF patients in the Americas are broadly consistent with international reports. However, the low use of OMT observed in this population underscores gaps in adherence to current guidelines. These results highlight the need for targeted strategies to improve pharmacological treatment adherence to optimize health outcomes in this region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.