Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40094181›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2025

Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Comorbidity Status on the Prognosis of Patients With Hypertension: Insights From SPRINT.

Wen Zheng, Siyi Li, Chao Jiang, Wen Hao, Hui Ai, Xiao Wang, Changsheng Ma, Shaoping Nie

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01206062 (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01206062 nacompletednot on this map

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)Ran2010 to 2019Enrolled9,361ConditionsHypertensionArmsIntensive control of SBP, Standard control of SBP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wen ZhengDivision of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-4030-0799
Siyi LiDivision of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Chao JiangDivision of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-1138-7960
Wen HaoDivision of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Hui AiDivision of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.
Xiao WangDivision of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-8420-8911
Changsheng MaDivision of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0002-5387-5957
Shaoping NieDivision of Cardiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China.ORCID 0000-0003-0664-5857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is common and leads to negative outcomes. Intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering can reduce cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, but its benefits for patients with hypertension with multiple comorbidities are uncertain. This study aimed to explore how comorbidities affect the clinical outcomes of intensive BP lowering in participants from the SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).

methodsWe analyzed data from the SPRINT data set and calculated each patient's comorbidity score using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, including cardiovascular death, heart failure, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome not leading to myocardial infarction, and stroke. Secondary end points included each component of the primary end point and all-cause death.

resultsWe categorized 9361 patients into 3 groups based on CCI scores: 0, 1 to 2, and ≥3. Patients with higher CCI scores had more cardiovascular and cerebrovascular comorbidities. Intensive BP treatment significantly lowered the risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in patients with CCI scores of 0 (7.1% versus 10.9%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.634 [95% CI, 0.474-0.848];

conclusionsIntensive BP control decreased cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with mild or moderate comorbidity burden, particularly in those with mild comorbidities. This emphasizes the importance of optimizing BP management even in patients with hypertension without extensive comorbid conditions, as their risk may be underestimated. REGISTRATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01206062.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionAgedCardiovascular DiseasesCause of DeathComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressurecomorbidityhypertension

Identifiers

PMID40094181
PMCPMC12132750

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.