Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095085›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2025

Comparison of different Raman spectrometer models in the quantification of blood serum analytes.

Hector Enrique Giana, Luisa Oliveira Souza, Landulfo Silveira

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hector Enrique GianaUniversidade Anhembi Morumbi, São José dos Campos, Brazil. hegiana@gmail.com.
Luisa Oliveira SouzaLaboratório LabVivalle, São José dos Campos, Brazil.
Landulfo SilveiraUniversidade Anhembi Morumbi, São José dos Campos, Brazil. landulfo.silveira@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analytical performance of three commercial Raman spectrometers in determining the concentrations of analytes associated with diagnosing metabolic, cardiovascular, and renal disorders has been compared. Two portable and one benchtop spectrometers were tested to predict the serum concentrations of triglycerides (TRI), cholesterol (COL), high-density cholesterol, creatinine, urea, and glucose in 193 serum samples using partial least squares (PLS) regression and PLS discriminant analysis, the latter for classifying samples as either altered or within reference values. Strong correlations (r > 0.81) were obtained for TRI and COL analytes using the benchtop and one of the portable spectrometers, and the classification accuracy rates exceeded 90%, suggesting potential for use in clinical screening. Adding a glucose solution improved the correlation and the root mean square error for TRI and COL analytes; however, it did not enhance the correlation or error for the glucose analyte. Raman spectroscopy showed potential to support routine laboratory activities and may have applications in clinical screening.

Indexed as

Blood Chemical AnalysisSpectrum Analysis, RamanBlood GlucoseCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCreatinineDiscriminant AnalysisHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisTriglyceridesUreaBlood GlucoseCholesterolCholesterol, HDLCreatinineTriglyceridesUreaBlood serumClinical analytesMetabolic indicatorsQuantificationRaman spectroscopy

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.