ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Comparison of different Raman spectrometer models in the quantification of blood serum analytes.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analytical performance of three commercial Raman spectrometers in determining the concentrations of analytes associated with diagnosing metabolic, cardiovascular, and renal disorders has been compared. Two portable and one benchtop spectrometers were tested to predict the serum concentrations of triglycerides (TRI), cholesterol (COL), high-density cholesterol, creatinine, urea, and glucose in 193 serum samples using partial least squares (PLS) regression and PLS discriminant analysis, the latter for classifying samples as either altered or within reference values. Strong correlations (r > 0.81) were obtained for TRI and COL analytes using the benchtop and one of the portable spectrometers, and the classification accuracy rates exceeded 90%, suggesting potential for use in clinical screening. Adding a glucose solution improved the correlation and the root mean square error for TRI and COL analytes; however, it did not enhance the correlation or error for the glucose analyte. Raman spectroscopy showed potential to support routine laboratory activities and may have applications in clinical screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40095085What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.