Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095151›Full record

ReviewClinical oral investigations2025

Clinical applications and classification of calcium silicate-based cements based on their history and evolution: a narrative review.

Kenta Tsuchiya, Salvatore Sauro, Hidehiko Sano, Jukka P Matinlinna, Monica Yamauti, Shuhei Hoshika, Yu Toida, Rafiqul Islam, Atsushi Tomokiyo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trends and Future Perspectives in Additive Modifications of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: A Scoping Review (2015-2024).Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kenta TsuchiyaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan. kentatsuchiya1222@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3920-3448
Salvatore SauroDental Biomaterials and Minimally Invasive Dentistry, Departamento de Odontología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad CEU-Cardenal Herrera, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2527-8776
Hidehiko SanoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1505-4047
Jukka P MatinlinnaDental Materials Science, Applied Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7656-0678
Monica YamautiDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-4407
Shuhei HoshikaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5547-919X
Yu ToidaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-347X
Rafiqul IslamDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1409-8112
Atsushi TomokiyoDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1638-4008

Funding

Japan Science and Technology Agency JPMJSP2119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective of this narrative review was to analyze the evolution of the calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) products since 1993 and classify them to better understand their appropriate use in clinical practice and foster innovation in dental material development. MATERIALS AND

methodsA narrative review of the relevant literature was conducted, collecting findings from computerized databases (PubMed, Science Direct, SCOPUS, and Web of Science) to provide historical background, classification, and modifications of CSCs published between 1993 and 2024.

resultsWe classified CSCs into six distinct generations based on previous literature. This classification revealed that the improvement in CSC's drawbacks, especially in physio-chemical properties, have led to the development of novel CSCs products. It also exhibited little to no variation in the bioactivity of CSCs across different generations and raised concerns regarding the biocompatibility of resin-modified CSC.

conclusionsNo CSC has yet emerged as a potential gold-standard material for endodontic treatments. Therefore, clinical applications tailored to the characteristics of each generation of CSCs are essential. Future advancements are anticipated to enable CSCs to induce the regeneration of tissues such as dentin, cementum, periodontal ligament, and dental pulp by incorporating regulatory signals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This comprehensive classification system would assist clinicians in choosing the appropriate CSCs for various clinical situations by considering critical factors. This systematic approach enables clinicians to rely on evidence-based material selection rather than marketing claims. Furthermore, the insights into their evolution, classification, and clinical applications would fill a knowledge gap for clinicians and researchers.

Indexed as

Calcium CompoundsDental CementsSilicatesHumansCalcium Compoundscalcium silicateDental CementsSilicatesCalcium silicate cementDental cement classificationEndodonticsHistoryMineral trioxide aggregate

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.