ReviewClinical oral investigations2025
Clinical applications and classification of calcium silicate-based cements based on their history and evolution: a narrative review.
Review in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological effects of a premixed calcium silicate pulp-capping material containing dimethyl sulphoxide as a vehicle: In vitro and in vivo study.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
- Trends and Future Perspectives in Additive Modifications of Calcium Silicate-Based Cements: A Scoping Review (2015-2024).Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc · 2026Article
- Comparison of cytotoxicity and physicochemical properties of Cal Bio LC MTA, ProRoot MTA and NeoPutty MTA: an in vitro study.Odontology · 2026Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Novel Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Modified Calcium Silicate Materials: Cytocompatibility and Mineralization Potential on Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells for Pulp Repair.Microscopy research and technique · 2026Article
- Calcium Silicate-Based Cements for Vital Pulp Therapy: Integrated Assessment of Radiopacity, Elemental Composition, and 24-h Pulp Cell Responses.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Obturation quality analysis of furcation perforations repaired with different magnifications and biomaterials.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Nonvital Pulp Therapy in Primary Teeth Using Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Obturation: A Retrospective Case Series.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Marginal Adaptability of Harvard MTA and Biodentine Used as Root-End Filling Material: A Comparative SEM Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this narrative review was to analyze the evolution of the calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) products since 1993 and classify them to better understand their appropriate use in clinical practice and foster innovation in dental material development. MATERIALS AND
methodsA narrative review of the relevant literature was conducted, collecting findings from computerized databases (PubMed, Science Direct, SCOPUS, and Web of Science) to provide historical background, classification, and modifications of CSCs published between 1993 and 2024.
resultsWe classified CSCs into six distinct generations based on previous literature. This classification revealed that the improvement in CSC's drawbacks, especially in physio-chemical properties, have led to the development of novel CSCs products. It also exhibited little to no variation in the bioactivity of CSCs across different generations and raised concerns regarding the biocompatibility of resin-modified CSC.
conclusionsNo CSC has yet emerged as a potential gold-standard material for endodontic treatments. Therefore, clinical applications tailored to the characteristics of each generation of CSCs are essential. Future advancements are anticipated to enable CSCs to induce the regeneration of tissues such as dentin, cementum, periodontal ligament, and dental pulp by incorporating regulatory signals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This comprehensive classification system would assist clinicians in choosing the appropriate CSCs for various clinical situations by considering critical factors. This systematic approach enables clinicians to rely on evidence-based material selection rather than marketing claims. Furthermore, the insights into their evolution, classification, and clinical applications would fill a knowledge gap for clinicians and researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40095151What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.