Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095197›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Dietitians' practices and perspectives of the delivery of nutritional care to cancer survivors in the primary care setting.

Henriette G Ryding, Roshan R Rigby, Elizabeth A Johnston, Rozanne Kruger, Lana J Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Triage tools to inform the prioritisation of physical health services following a diagnosis of cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Henriette G RydingSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-5259
Roshan R RigbySchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4829-8371
Elizabeth A JohnstonViertel Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9486-5704
Rozanne KrugerSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2117-3237
Lana J MitchellSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. Lana.mitchell@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-2131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe number of people living longer after a cancer diagnosis is increasing. Guidelines for cancer survivorship recommend a healthy diet and maintaining a healthy weight post-treatment. While cancer survivors often express the need for professional support for nutrition management, few report seeing a dietitian. This study aimed to explore primary care dietitians' experiences, practices, and perspectives in providing nutritional care to cancer survivors in Australia.

methodsThis qualitative study used in-depth, semi-structured interviews with primary care dietitians working in private practice and community care. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. A qualitative descriptive methodological approach integrated with a working analytical framework was utilized for coding and data analysis.

resultsTwenty-four dietitians working in primary care participated. Four themes and 13 sub-themes were identified: (1) diversity in dietetic practice and cancer-related care interactions; (2) accessing referral pathways and funding sources in a complex healthcare system; (3) the application of nutrition education, and upskilling in cancer care; (4) client barriers and dietitians' challenges and factors influencing confidence in cancer care.

conclusionDietitians in this study highlighted the need for clear referral pathways to primary care particularly as a continuation of cancer-related care following the acute setting. There is a need for tailored support for dietitians supporting people diagnosed with cancer in the primary care setting, including opportunities to upskill in cancer care.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsNutritionistsNutrition TherapyPrimary Health CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationDietary managementDieteticsReferral pathwaysSupportive careSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40095197
PMCPMC11913905

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.