Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40095253›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Advanced machine learning framework for enhancing breast cancer diagnostics through transcriptomic profiling.

Mohamed J Saadh, Hanan Hassan Ahmed, Radhwan Abdul Kareem, Anupam Yadav, Subbulakshmi Ganesan, Aman Shankhyan, Girish Chandra Sharma, K Satyam Naidu, Akmal Rakhmatullaev, Hayder Naji Sameer and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mohamed J SaadhFaculty of Pharmacy, Middle East University, Amman, 11831, Jordan.
Hanan Hassan AhmedCollege of Pharmacy, Alnoor University, Mosul, Iraq.
Radhwan Abdul KareemAhl Al Bayt University, Kerbala, Iraq.
Anupam YadavDepartment of Computer Engineering and Application, GLA University, Mathura, 281406, India.
Subbulakshmi GanesanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to Be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Aman ShankhyanCentre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India.
Girish Chandra SharmaDepartment of Applied Sciences-Chemistry, NIMS Institute of Engineering and Technology, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
K Satyam NaiduDepartment of Chemistry, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 531162, India.
Akmal RakhmatullaevDepartment of Faculty Pediatric Surgery, Tashkent Pediatric Medical Institute, Bogishamol Street 223, 100140, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Hayder Naji SameerCollage of Pharmacy, National University of Science and Technology, Dhi Qar, 64001, Iraq.
Ahmed YaseenGilgamesh Ahliya University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Zainab H AthabDepartment of Pharmacy, Al-Zahrawi University College, Karbala, Iraq.
Mohaned AdilPharmacy College, Al-Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Bagher FarhoodDepartment of Medical Physics and Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran. farhood-b@kaums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2290-7220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study proposes an advanced machine learning (ML) framework for breast cancer diagnostics by integrating transcriptomic profiling with optimized feature selection and classification techniques. MATERIALS AND

methodsA dataset of 1759 samples (987 breast cancer patients, 772 healthy controls) was analyzed using Recursive Feature Elimination, Boruta, and ElasticNet for feature selection. Dimensionality reduction techniques, including Non-Negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), Autoencoders, and transformer-based embeddings (BioBERT, DNABERT), were applied to enhance model interpretability. Classifiers such as XGBoost, LightGBM, ensemble voting, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Stacking were trained using grid search and cross-validation. Model evaluation was conducted using accuracy, AUC, MCC, Kappa Score, ROC, and PR curves, with external validation performed on an independent dataset of 175 samples.

resultsXGBoost and LightGBM achieved the highest test accuracies (0.91 and 0.90) and AUC values (up to 0.92), particularly with NMF and BioBERT. The ensemble Voting method exhibited the best external accuracy (0.92), confirming its robustness. Transformer-based embeddings and advanced feature selection techniques significantly improved model performance compared to conventional approaches like PCA and Decision Trees.

conclusionThe proposed ML framework enhances diagnostic accuracy and interpretability, demonstrating strong generalizability on an external dataset. These findings highlight its potential for precision oncology and personalized breast cancer diagnostics.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreast cancerFeature selectionMachine learningPredictive modelingTranscriptomic profiling

Identifiers

PMID40095253
PMCPMC11914415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.