ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Recent Advances in Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-Reported Health Status and Clinical Outcomes After CTO-PCI Versus Optimal Medical Therapy: A 12-Month Retrospective Observational Cohort Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- When Functional Assessment Meets Intravascular Imaging in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs) have been a point of interest of the medical community for the last decade. The natural history of CTOs was for a long time unknown, as the presence of a single CTO was the most frequent cause for the exclusion of patients from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Recent CTO RCTs have failed to show any benefit in terms of hard endpoints as major adverse cardiovascular events, but have shown a significant improvement in quality of life, as well in the frequency of angina; however, these studies are characterized by the limitation of the short duration of their follow-up period. Real-world data from observational studies indicate a significant improvement in cardiovascular death and overall mortality, suggesting that the results depend on the duration of the follow-up, and not on the procedure per se. The aim of the current review is to summarize all the existing RCTs, and to analyze the most important registries, as well as to present the current development of techniques to boost the successful interventional treatment of CTOs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.