ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Clinical and Neuroradiological Manifestations of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: A Closer Look into the Natural History of a Frequent Disease.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of Genetics in Stroke Risk and Outcome: A Review of Current Evidence.Brain and behavior · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- Teaching common cognitive biases and associated errors in veterinary neurologic diagnosis using clinical vignettes: a narrative review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Review
- Leptomeninges: Anatomy, Mechanisms of Disease and Neuroimaging.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: insights from a clinical case series.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is one of the most prevalent small vessel diseases (SVDs). Its neuroradiological hallmarks are both hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic ones. Among the clinical manifestations, transient focal neurological episodes (TFNEs) are associated with an increased risk of bleeding in a short time period and with convexal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The natural history of CAA is incompletely characterized in the literature, because the focus has been mostly on hemorrhagic events, while both clinical and non-hemorrhagic presentations are possible and sometimes underestimated. Furthermore, new diagnostic criteria have incorporated non-hemorrhagic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) markers and non-hemorrhagic clinical presentations. Disease trajectories are often individual and help provide food for thought and discussion on some issues, thus allowing for a greater and deeper evaluation. We, therefore, present a case that exemplifies how the natural history of CAA can be atypical compared to its expected course, which is long and not only hemorrhagic. Several episodes of CAA-related inflammation, with prevalent, but not exclusive, leptomeningeal involvement, were evaluated and treated in the presented case, in which the intraparenchymal cerebral hemorrhagic manifestation was the last in the patient's history. CAA may have a very long natural history. During the disease's course, inflammatory features might be prominent in neuroimaging but not strongly symptomatic, and intraparenchymal cerebral hemorrhage (ICH) may be a late event. The awareness of this subtype of the disease allows us to better explore the pathophysiology of CAA and to increase the level of clinical suspicion for the diagnosis. Furthermore, the distinction between different disease phenotypes can provide useful information for patient management in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.