ArticlePloS one2025
In silico identification of novel ligands targeting stress-related human FKBP5 protein in mental disorders.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Polymorphisms Associated with Lithium Response in Bipolar Disorder: An Integrative Review and In Silico Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Chrysin and Luteolin from Moroccan Propolis to Prevent Aggressive Periodontitis Caused byPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The mechanism and clinical significance of FKBP5 gene DNA methylation in various psychiatric, metabolic and tumor-related diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP51 or FKBP5) serves as a crucial stress modulator implicated in mental disorders, presenting a potential target for intervention. Inhibitors like SAFit2, rapamycin, and tacrolimus exhibit promising interactions with this protein. Despite these advances, challenges persist in diversifying FKBP5 ligands, prompting further exploration of interaction partners. Hence, this study aims to identify other potential ligands. Employing molecular docking, we generated complexes with various ligands (rapamycin, tacrolimus, SAFit2-Selective antagonist of FKBP51 by induced fit, ascomycin, pimecrolimus, rosavin, salidroside, curcumin, apigenin, uvaricin, ruscogenin, neoruscogenin, pumicalagin, castalagin, and grandinin). We identified the top 3 best ligands, of which ruscogenin and neoruscogenin had notable abilities to cross the blood-brain barrier and have high gastrointestinal absorption, like curcumin. Toxicity predictions show ruscogenin and neoruscogenin to be the least toxic based on oral toxicity classification (Class VI). Tyrosine (Tyr113) formed consistent interactions with all ligands in the complex, reinforcing their potential and involvement in stress modulation. Molecular dynamic (MD) simulation validated strong interactions between our three key ligands and FKBP5 protein and provided an understanding of the stability of the complex. The binding free energy (ΔG) of the best ligands (based on pharmacological properties) from MD simulation analysis is -31.78 kcal/mol for neoruscogenin, -30.41 kcal/mol for ruscogenin, and -27.6 kcal/mol for curcumin. These molecules, therefore, can serve as therapeutic molecules or biomarkers for research in stress-impacted mental disorders. While offering therapeutic implications for mental disorders by attenuating stress impact, it is crucial to emphasize that these ligands' transition to clinical applications necessitates extensive experimental research, including clinical trials, to unravel the intricate molecular and neural pathways involved in these interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.