ReviewKorean circulation journal2025
Echocardiographic Parameters of the Right Ventricle in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: A Review.
Review in Korean circulation journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic Value of the RVFWLS/PASP Ratio in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Assessment of Right Ventricular Adaptability to Pressure Overloading for Critical Therapeutic Decision-Making Processes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Dynamic changes in right ventricular free wall strain during hemodialysis identify patients at risk for intradialytic hypotension.Clinical hypertension · 2026Article
- Sotatercept for pulmonary arterial hypertension on background therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To diagnose pulmonary hypertension (PH) and assess its severity, accurate measurement of pulmonary artery (PA) pressure is crucial. However, there can be significant discrepancies between echocardiography (Echo) and invasive catheterization. The right ventricle (RV) has a complex structure, and its remodeling in PH is diverse, making it challenging to evaluate RV physiology with a single imaging modality. While right heart catheterization is the gold standard, its practicality in clinical settings is limited. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is valuable for RV evaluation, with 4-dimensional flow MRI showing promise, yet accessibility remains a concern. Thus, in PH patient management, Echo plays a central role as a practical decision-making tool. This review aims to elucidate Echo parameters in PH patients, highlighting differences in PA systolic pressure measurements, RV-PA coupling, RV remodeling patterns crucial for understanding PH progression, and clinical evidence regarding RV strain. Additionally, it aims to introduce new Echo parameters that help understand RV in PH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.