ReviewJournal of molecular cell biology2025
Calciphylaxis: ongoing challenges and treatment opportunities with mesenchymal stem cells.
Review in Journal of molecular cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04592640 (Effects of Human Amniotic-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effects of Human Amniotic-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (hAMSCs) on Calciphylaxis Patients: An Open-Label Single-Arm Study
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomics and human microchips identify Thrombospondin-1 as a potential biomarker for calciphylaxis stem cell therapy.iScience · 2026Article
- Calciphylaxis in children: a case series and systematic review.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calciphylaxis is a rare, progressive disorder characterized by subcutaneous adipose and dermal microvascular calcifications, microthrombi, and endothelial damage. It mainly affects patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), which is also known as calcific uremic arteriolopathy. Skin biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis, but it is an invasive procedure. Calciphylaxis frequently results in ischemic and nonhealing ulcerations with a high mortality rate. A multidisciplinary targeted approach is the primary treatment method. Vascular calcification, which is a common complication in patients with CKD, cannot completely explain the rapid progression of calciphylaxis. This article reviews the advances in the epidemiological characteristics, risk factors, and diagnosis, including non-uremic calciphylaxis and visceral calciphylaxis, pathogenesis, associated animal models, and treatment of calciphylaxis. The scarcity of animal models that mimic the clinical presentation of calciphylaxis hampers the understanding of its pathogenesis. The acute effects on progressive vascular injury, including the induction of severe ischemia and inflammatory responses, have been emphasized. Actively listening to the voices of patients and their families and building a multidimensional research system with artificial intelligence technologies based on the specific molecular makeup of calciphylaxis patients will help tailor regenerative treatment strategies. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may represent a novel therapy for calciphylaxis because of their regenerative effects, inhibition of vascular calcification, anti-infection and immunomodulation properties, and improvement of hypercoagulability. Safe, effective, accessible, and economical MSC strategies guided by biomarkers deserve consideration for the treatment of this devastating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.